Chrysler 300C 2005 vs Chevrolet Impala 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 5.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 HP | 307 HP | |
| Torque: | 525 NM | 438 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
| Chrysler 300C engine produces 33 HP more power than Chevrolet Impala, whereas torque is 87 NM more than Chevrolet Impala. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.1 | 10.2 | |
|
The Chevrolet Impala is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler 300C consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Impala, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 300C could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Impala gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler 300C is 7 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Impala, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300C is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 504 litres | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
504 litres | no data | |
|
Chevrolet Impala has more luggage space. Chrysler 300C has 23 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Impala. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Chevrolet Impala has
| |