Chrysler 300C 2004 vs Ford Mustang 2006
| Body: | Sedan | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 5.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 HP | 500 HP | |
| Torque: | 525 NM | 650 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | 4.5 seconds | |
|
Ford Mustang is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler 300C engine produces 160 HP less power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 125 NM less than Ford Mustang. Due to the lower power, Chrysler 300C reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.0 | 11.6 | |
| Chrysler 300C consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 300C could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 640 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler 300C gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Chrysler 300C is larger. Chrysler 300C is 27 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, width is practically the same , while the height of Chrysler 300C is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 504 litres | 348 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
504 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler 300C has more luggage capacity. Chrysler 300C has 156 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mustang. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`280 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |