Chrysler 300C 2004 vs Dodge Charger 2005
| Body: | Sedan | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 HP | 345 HP | |
| Torque: | 525 NM | 525 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | 6 seconds | |
|
Dodge Charger is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler 300C engine produces 5 HP less power than Dodge Charger, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Chrysler 300C reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.0 | 11.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 14.1 l/100km | 12.8 l/100km | |
|
The Dodge Charger is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chrysler 300C consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Charger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 300C could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler 300C consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Charger. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| 500 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 4 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler 300C is 6 cm shorter than the Dodge Charger, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 504 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
504 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler 300C has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Chrysler 300C has 48 litres more trunk space than the Dodge Charger. The Dodge Charger may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 300C is 0.1 metres more than that of the Dodge Charger. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`280 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Dodge Charger has
| |