Chrysler 300C 2004 vs Ford Mustang 2005
| Body: | Sedan | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 253 HP | 212 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 325 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 7 seconds | |
| Chrysler 300C engine produces 41 HP more power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Ford Mustang. Despite the higher power, Chrysler 300C reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 10.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Chrysler 300C consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 300C could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler 300C consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Chrysler 300C is larger. Chrysler 300C is 26 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, width is practically the same , while the height of Chrysler 300C is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 504 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
504 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler 300C has more luggage capacity. Chrysler 300C has 154 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mustang. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`180 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |