Chrysler 300C 2015 vs Lexus ES 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Chrysler 300C is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Lexus ES can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.6 - 6.4 | 2.0 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 286 - 476 HP | 150 - 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 637 NM | 192 - 356 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.9 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 - 13.0 | 6.6 - 8.8 | |
|
Chrysler 300C petrol engines consumes on average 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Lexus ES. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 4.98 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler 300C is 8 cm longer than the Lexus ES, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300C is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 462 litres | 472 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chrysler 300C has 10 litres less trunk space than the Lexus ES. This could mean that the Chrysler 300C uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`117 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Lexus ES has
| |