Chrysler 300C 2015 vs Jaguar XJR 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Chrysler 300C is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jaguar XJR can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.6 - 6.4 | 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 286 - 476 HP | 575 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 637 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 4.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 - 13.0 | 11.1 | |
|
Chrysler 300C petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jaguar XJR. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 5.13 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler 300C is 8 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJR, width is practically the same , while the height of Chrysler 300C is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 462 litres | 520 litres | |
|
Jaguar XJR has more luggage space. Chrysler 300C has 58 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XJR. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Jaguar XJR has
| |