Chrysler 300C 2015 vs Chevrolet Impala 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Chrysler 300C is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chevrolet Impala can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.6 - 6.4 | 2.4 - 3.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 286 - 476 HP | 184 - 309 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 637 NM | 233 - 358 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 - 13.0 | 8.1 - 10.7 | |
|
Chrysler 300C petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Impala. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 5.11 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.50 m | |
| Chrysler 300C is 6 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Impala, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300C is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 462 litres | 532 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Impala has more luggage space. Chrysler 300C has 70 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Impala. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Chevrolet Impala has
| |