Chrysler 300C 2004 vs Dodge Charger 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engines: | 2.7 - 6.1 (petrol, diesel) | 2.7 - 6.1 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 - 425 HP | 193 - 432 HP | |
| Torque: | 257 - 570 NM | 258 - 569 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 - 11 seconds | 4.9 - 6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 - 14.0 | 9.8 - 14.7 | |
|
On average, the Chrysler 300C petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Dodge Charger. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler 300C is 6 cm shorter than the Dodge Charger, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 504 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
504 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler 300C has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Chrysler 300C has 44 litres more trunk space than the Dodge Charger. The Dodge Charger may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 300C is 0.1 metres more than that of the Dodge Charger. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`269 | ~ 2`185 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Dodge Charger has
| |