Chrysler 300C 2004 vs Chrysler Pacifica 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chrysler 300C is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chrysler Pacifica can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Chrysler 300C also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.7 - 6.1 (petrol, diesel) | 3.5 - 4.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 - 425 HP | 213 - 257 HP | |
| Torque: | 257 - 570 NM | 325 - 355 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 - 11 seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 - 14.0 | 11.3 - 13.8 | |
|
On average, the Chrysler 300C petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Chrysler Pacifica. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.01 m | 5.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Chrysler 300C is smaller. Chrysler 300C is 4 cm shorter than the Chrysler Pacifica, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler 300C is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 630 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1602 litres | 2250 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Chrysler 300C has 260 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Pacifica. The Chrysler Pacifica may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Pacifica (by 648 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 300C is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chrysler Pacifica. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`334 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Chrysler Pacifica has
| |