Chrysler 300C 2004 vs Chrysler 300M 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Chrysler 300C is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chrysler 300M can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.7 - 6.1 (petrol, diesel) | 2.7 - 3.5 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 - 425 HP | 203 - 254 HP | |
| Torque: | 257 - 570 NM | 256 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 - 11 seconds | 8.8 - 10 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 - 14.0 | 10.5 - 10.7 | |
|
Chrysler 300C petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chrysler 300M. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.01 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.42 m | |
| Chrysler 300C is 1 cm longer than the Chrysler 300M, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler 300C is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 630 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1602 litres | 530 litres | |
|
Chrysler 300C has more luggage capacity. Chrysler 300C has 100 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 300M. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler 300C (by 1072 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 300C is 0.5 metres more than that of the Chrysler 300M, which means Chrysler 300C can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`334 | ~ 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 9.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Chrysler 300M has
| |