BMW 5 series 2000 vs Volvo XC70 2004
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 163 HP | 163 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
BMW 5 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 5 series and Volvo XC70 have the same engine power, but BMW 5 series torque is 10 NM more than Volvo XC70. BMW 5 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 8.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
By specification BMW 5 series consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70, which means that by driving the BMW 5 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 5 series consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
1110 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
840 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 560'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 12 years | 5 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC90, Volvo C30 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.80 m | 4.73 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.56 m | |
BMW 5 series is 7 cm longer than the Volvo XC70, 6 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 5 series is 12 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 485 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1525 litres | 1641 litres | |
Volvo XC70 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, BMW 5 series has 75 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC70. This could mean that the BMW 5 series uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC70 (by 116 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 5 series is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volvo XC70, which means BMW 5 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`315 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | below average | |
BMW 5 series has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo XC70 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than BMW 5 series, so BMW 5 series quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2200 | 4200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 8.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 5 sērija has
|
Volvo XC70 has
| |