Audi A6 2001 vs Volvo S60 2002

 
Audi A6
2001 - 2002
Volvo S60
2002 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Diesel2.4 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 155 HP130 HP
Torque: 310 NM280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.7 seconds12 seconds
Audi A6 is more dynamic to drive.
Audi A6 engine produces 25 HP more power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Volvo S60. Thanks to more power Audi A6 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.96.5
The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Audi A6 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi A6 could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1010 km in combined cycle1070 km in combined cycle
1320 km on highway1370 km on highway
Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 370'000 km560'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo S60 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 2 years6 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A4, Skoda SuperbUsed also on Volvo S80
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.58 m
Width: 1.81 m1.80 m
Height: 1.45 m1.43 m
Audi A6 is larger.
Audi A6 is 22 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 1 cm wider, while the height of Audi A6 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 551 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1034 litres
Audi A6 has more luggage capacity.
Audi A6 has 127 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60.
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A6 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Volvo S60, which means Audi A6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1102`030
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Volvo S60 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Audi A6 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 18001600
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: Audi A6 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Volvo S60 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv