Audi A6 1997 vs Rover 75 1999

 
Audi A6
1997 - 2001
Rover 75
1999 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 110 HP116 HP
Torque: 235 NM260 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.7 seconds11.7 seconds
Rover 75 is a more dynamic driving.
Audi A6 engine produces 6 HP less power than Rover 75, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Rover 75. Due to the lower power, Audi A6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.75.8
Real fuel consumption: 6.0 l/100km6.3 l/100km
The Audi A6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi A6 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75, which means that by driving the Audi A6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A6 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1220 km in combined cycle1120 km in combined cycle
1520 km on highway1380 km on highway
1160 km with real consumption1030 km with real consumption
Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.75 m
Width: 1.81 m1.78 m
Height: 1.45 m1.43 m
Both cars are similar in size. Audi A6 is 5 cm longer than the Rover 75, 3 cm wider, while the height of Audi A6 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 551 litres432 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data432 litres
Audi A6 has more luggage capacity.
Audi A6 has 119 litres more trunk space than the Rover 75.
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A6 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Rover 75.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0102`030
Safety:
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 14001800
Pros and Cons: Audi A6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Rover 75 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • higher safety
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv