Audi A6 2011 vs Jaguar XF 2012
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 245 HP | 275 HP | |
Torque: | 500 NM | 601 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 seconds | 6.6 seconds | |
Audi A6 engine produces 30 HP less power than Jaguar XF, whereas torque is 101 NM less than Jaguar XF. Despite less power, Audi A6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
The Jaguar XF is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Audi A6 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF, which means that by driving the Audi A6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi A6 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A6) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.93 m | 4.97 m | |
Width: | 1.87 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Audi A6 is 4 cm shorter than the Jaguar XF, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi A6 is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 565 litres | 549 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Audi A6 has 16 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar XF. The Jaguar XF may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`420 | 2`440 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | no data | |
Average price (€): | 9800 | 11 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi A6 has
|
Jaguar XF has
| |