Audi A6 2000 vs BMW 3 series 1998

 
Audi A6
2000 - 2001
BMW 3 series
1998 - 2000
Body: Estate car / wagonSedan
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.8 Petrol2.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 193 HP193 HP
Torque: 280 NM280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.3 seconds7 seconds
Audi A6 and BMW 3 series have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Audi A6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.79.1
Real fuel consumption: 10.3 l/100km9.8 l/100km
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi A6 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi A6 could require 90 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A6 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle690 km in combined cycle
980 km on highway900 km on highway
670 km with real consumption640 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.47 m
Width: 1.81 m1.74 m
Height: 1.48 m1.42 m
Audi A6 is larger.
Audi A6 is 33 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 7 cm wider, while the height of Audi A6 is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 455 litres440 litres
Audi A6 has 15 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A6 is 1.7 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Audi A6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1401`895
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

below average
Audi A6 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for BMW 3 series, so Audi A6 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 14002000
Rating in user reviews: 7.8/10 7.5/10
Pros and Cons: Audi A6 has
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv