Audi A6 2018 vs Jaguar XF 2015

 
Audi A6
2018 -
Jaguar XF
2015 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 286 HP180 HP
Torque: 620 NM430 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds8.1 seconds
Audi A6 engine produces 106 HP more power than Jaguar XF, whereas torque is 190 NM more than Jaguar XF.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.84.3
Real fuel consumption: 8.3 l/100km6.6 l/100km
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi A6 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi A6 could require 225 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A6 consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 460'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi A6 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 7 years9 years
Engine spread: Used also on Audi A7Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE, Land Rover Discovery Sport
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar XF might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.94 m4.95 m
Width: 1.89 m1.99 m
Height: 1.46 m1.46 m
Audi A6 is smaller.
Audi A6 is 2 cm shorter than the Jaguar XF, 10 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 530 litres540 litres
Audi A6 has 10 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XF.
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A6 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Jaguar XF, which means Audi A6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data2`250
Safety:
The Jaguar XF scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 38 60021 400
Pros and Cons: Audi A6 has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Jaguar XF has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv