Audi A4 1999 vs Chevrolet Epica 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Audi A4 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chevrolet Epica can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.8 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 193 HP | 141 - 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 - 310 NM | 195 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 - 14.6 seconds | 9.7 - 10.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 10.9 | 6.1 - 9.3 | |
|
Audi A4 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Epica. On average, Audi A4 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Epica. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Audi A4 is smaller. Audi A4 is 32 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Epica, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A4 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Epica has more luggage space. Audi A4 has 40 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Epica. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi A4 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Epica. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`895 | ~ 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.2/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A4 has
|
Chevrolet Epica has
| |