Audi A3 2000 vs Audi A3 2006

 
Audi A3
2000 - 2003
Audi A3
2006 - 2008
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chain and beltTiming chain

Performance

Power: 150 HP160 HP
Torque: 210 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.2 seconds8.2 seconds
Audi A3 2000 engine produces 10 HP less power than Audi A3 2006, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Audi A3 2006.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.77.4
Real fuel consumption: 8.5 l/100km8.2 l/100km
The Audi A3 2006 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi A3 2000 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3 2006, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi A3 2000 could require 195 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A3 2000 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3 2006.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 710 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
720 km with real consumption670 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 440'000 km320'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi A3 2000 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 9 years1 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Audi A4, Skoda OctaviaUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi A3 2000 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.15 m4.29 m
Width: 1.74 m1.76 m
Height: 1.43 m1.42 m
Audi A3 2000 is smaller, but slightly higher.
Audi A3 2000 is 14 cm shorter than the Audi A3 2006, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A3 2000 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 270 litres370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1020 litres1120 litres
Audi A3 2006 has more luggage space.
Audi A3 2000 has 100 litres less trunk space than the Audi A3 2006. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A3 2006 (by 100 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A3 2000 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Audi A3 2006.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8501`905
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

high
Audi A3 2006 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Audi A3 2000 has serious deffects in 125 percent more cases than Audi A3 2006, so Audi A3 2006 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 16003200
Pros and Cons: Audi A3 has
  • has 4x4 drive
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Audi A3 has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv