Audi 80 1992 vs Volvo S60 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.6 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving. Audi 80 engine produces 60 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 95 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 9.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.6 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi 80 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 80 could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 80 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Audi 80 1990: Vehicle features full-time Quattro II all-wheel drive - Torsen center differential with automatic torque split between front and rear axles, and electro-pneumatic manually-activated rear differential that automatically unlocks at speeds above 25 km/h. Volvo S60 2000: It has Haldex Generation II type automatic all wheel drive. In normal driving conditions torque distribution is 90% to front wheels and 10% to rear. If wheel spin is detected system locks multi-plate and torque is distributed between the axles evenly (50%/50%). | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Audi 80 is smaller. Audi 80 is 10 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 424 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
710 litres | 1034 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Audi 80 has 6 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. The Volvo S60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S60 (by 324 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means Audi 80 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`890 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Volvo S60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi 80 has serious deffects in 480 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 80 has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |