Audi 80 1991 vs Volvo 960 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 267 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Volvo 960 is a more dynamic driving. Audi 80 engine produces 88 HP less power than Volvo 960, whereas torque is 102 NM less than Volvo 960. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 11.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 12.4 l/100km | |
|
The Audi 80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi 80 consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960, which means that by driving the Audi 80 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 80 consumes 3.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi 80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi 100 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo S90, Volvo V90 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo 960 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Audi 80 is smaller. Audi 80 is 39 cm shorter than the Volvo 960, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 491 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
710 litres | no data | |
|
Volvo 960 has more luggage space. Audi 80 has 61 litres less trunk space than the Volvo 960. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 1.3 metres more than that of the Volvo 960, which means Audi 80 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`690 | 1`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 80 has
|
Volvo 960 has
| |