Audi 80 1993 vs Audi 80 1989
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 202 NM | 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.7 seconds | 16.9 seconds | |
|
Audi 80 1993 is more dynamic to drive. Audi 80 1993 engine produces 22 HP more power than Audi 80 1989, whereas torque is 75 NM more than Audi 80 1989. Thanks to more power Audi 80 1993 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Audi 80 1989 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi 80 1993 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80 1989, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 80 1993 could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 80 1993 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80 1989. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1210 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km with real consumption | 1170 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi 80 1989 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 700'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi 80 1989 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi A4, Audi A6, Volkswagen Vento, Seat Alhambra | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Toledo, Skoda Felicia | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi 80 1989 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.40 m | |
| Audi 80 1993 is 9 cm longer than the Audi 80 1989, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi 80 1993 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
710 litres | no data | |
|
Audi 80 1989 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Audi 80 1993 has 55 litres less trunk space than the Audi 80 1989. This could mean that the Audi 80 1993 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 80 1993 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Audi 80 1989, which means Audi 80 1993 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`560 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 7.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 80 has
|
Audi 80 has
| |