Audi 80 1992 vs Ford Scorpio 1992
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 92 HP | |
Torque: | 202 NM | 201 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 14.8 seconds | |
Audi 80 is more dynamic to drive. Audi 80 engine produces 2 HP less power than Ford Scorpio, but torque is 1 NM more than Ford Scorpio. Despite less power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 8.1 | |
The Audi 80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi 80 consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio, which means that by driving the Audi 80 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
Audi 80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.74 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.49 m | |
Audi 80 is smaller. Audi 80 is 26 cm shorter than the Ford Scorpio, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1200 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Audi 80 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 1`300 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | below average | |
Audi 80 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Scorpio has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Audi 80, so Audi 80 quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi 80 has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |