Audi 100 1982 vs Audi 100 1991
| Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 123 NM | 164 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.6 seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
|
Audi 100 1991 is a more dynamic driving. Audi 100 1982 engine produces 13 HP less power than Audi 100 1991, whereas torque is 41 NM less than Audi 100 1991. Due to the lower power, Audi 100 1982 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 7.6 | |
|
The Audi 100 1982 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi 100 1982 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100 1991, which means that by driving the Audi 100 1982 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1190 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| Audi 100 1982 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 530'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi 100 1991 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 3 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi 100 1982 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Audi 100 1991 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Audi 100 1982 and Audi 100 1991 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 570 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
610 litres | 1310 litres | |
| Audi 100 1982 has 180 litres more trunk space than the Audi 100 1991. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi 100 1991 (by 700 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 100 1982 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Audi 100 1991. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`710 | 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 100 has
|
Audi 100 has
| |