Audi 100 1986 vs Audi 100 1991

 
Audi 100
1986 - 1988
Audi 100
1991 - 1993
Body: SedanEstate car / wagon
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 88 HP101 HP
Torque: 142 NM157 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.2 seconds13.1 seconds
Audi 100 1986 engine produces 13 HP less power than Audi 100 1991, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Audi 100 1991. Despite less power, Audi 100 1986 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.68.5
Real fuel consumption: 8.0 l/100km8.9 l/100km
The Audi 100 1986 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi 100 1986 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100 1991, which means that by driving the Audi 100 1986 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 100 1986 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100 1991.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1050 km in combined cycle940 km in combined cycle
1000 km with real consumption890 km with real consumption
Audi 100 1986 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.79 m
Width: 1.81 m1.78 m
Height: 1.42 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Audi 100 1986 and Audi 100 1991 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 570 litres390 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
610 litres1310 litres
Audi 100 1986 has 180 litres more trunk space than the Audi 100 1991. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi 100 1991 (by 700 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Audi 100 1986 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Audi 100 1991.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6401`910
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 20001000
Rating in user reviews: 7.0/10 7.8/10
Pros and Cons: Audi 100 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Audi 100 has
  • more power
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv