Audi 100 1989 vs Skoda Yeti 2009
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Audi 100 is more dynamic to drive. Audi 100 engine produces 5 HP more power than Skoda Yeti, but torque is 10 NM less than Skoda Yeti. Thanks to more power Audi 100 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | no data | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Audi 100 is larger, but lower. Audi 100 is 57 cm longer than the Skoda Yeti, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi 100 is 27 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 570 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
610 litres | no data | |
|
Audi 100 has more luggage capacity. Audi 100 has 165 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 100 is 1.3 metres more than that of the Skoda Yeti, which means Audi 100 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 2`065 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 6600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 100 has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |