Audi 100 1992 vs Skoda Octavia 2004
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 230 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Audi 100 is more dynamic to drive. Audi 100 engine produces 80 HP more power than Skoda Octavia, whereas torque is 150 NM more than Skoda Octavia. Thanks to more power Audi 100 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.8 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi 100 consumes 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 100 could require 555 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 100 consumes 4.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Audi 100 has 4x4: Vehicle features full-time Quattro II all-wheel drive - Torsen center differential with automatic torque split between front and rear axles, and electro-pneumatic manually-activated rear differential that automatically unlocks at speeds above 25 km/h. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi 100 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 5 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Audi 100 is larger, but slightly lower. Audi 100 is 22 cm longer than the Skoda Octavia, 3 cm wider, while the height of Audi 100 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1310 litres | 1350 litres | |
|
Skoda Octavia has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Audi 100 has 170 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Octavia. This could mean that the Audi 100 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Octavia (by 40 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 100 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Octavia, which means Audi 100 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`160 | 1`995 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 100 has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |