Audi 100 1991 vs Volvo 850 1993

 
Audi 100
1991 - 1994
Volvo 850
1993 - 1994
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Diesel2.4 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 115 HP170 HP
Torque: 265 NM220 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.6 seconds10.5 seconds
Volvo 850 is a more dynamic driving.
Audi 100 engine produces 55 HP less power than Volvo 850, but torque is 45 NM more than Volvo 850. Due to the lower power, Audi 100 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.59.1
Real fuel consumption: 6.7 l/100km10.0 l/100km
The Audi 100 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi 100 consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 850, which means that by driving the Audi 100 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 100 consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 850.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres73 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1230 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
1190 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption
Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 770'000 km560'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi 100 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 6 years8 years
Engine spread: Used also on Audi A6Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S70
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo 850 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.71 m
Width: 1.78 m1.76 m
Height: 1.44 m1.43 m
Both cars are similar in size. Audi 100 is 8 cm longer than the Volvo 850, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi 100 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 390 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1310 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Audi 100 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Volvo 850, which means Audi 100 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0251`600
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

high
Volvo 850 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Audi 100 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Volvo 850, so Volvo 850 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 1000600
Pros and Cons: Audi 100 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Volvo 850 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv