Audi 100 1991 vs Opel Omega 1994

 
Audi 100
1991 - 1994
Opel Omega
1994 - 1997
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Diesel2.5 Diesel

Performance

Power: 115 HP130 HP
Torque: 265 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.6 seconds13 seconds
Audi 100 is more dynamic to drive.
Audi 100 engine produces 15 HP less power than Opel Omega, but torque is 15 NM more than Opel Omega. Despite less power, Audi 100 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.57.7
Real fuel consumption: 6.7 l/100km8.3 l/100km
The Audi 100 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi 100 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that by driving the Audi 100 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 100 consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1230 km in combined cycle970 km in combined cycle
1660 km on highway1170 km on highway
1190 km with real consumption900 km with real consumption
Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.82 m
Width: 1.78 m1.79 m
Height: 1.44 m1.50 m
Audi 100 is smaller.
Audi 100 is 3 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 100 is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 390 litres540 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1310 litres1800 litres
Opel Omega has more luggage space.
Audi 100 has 150 litres less trunk space than the Opel Omega. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Omega (by 490 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Audi 100 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Opel Omega, which means Audi 100 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0252`280
Safety: no datano data
Quality:Opel Omega has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Audi 100 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Opel Omega, so Opel Omega quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 1000600
Pros and Cons: Audi 100 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Opel Omega has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv