Audi 100 1991 vs Skoda Octavia 2005
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 168 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Skoda Octavia is a more dynamic driving. Audi 100 engine produces 34 HP less power than Skoda Octavia, whereas torque is 32 NM less than Skoda Octavia. Due to the lower power, Audi 100 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 8.3 | |
|
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi 100 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 100 could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi 100 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi 80 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi 100 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Audi 100 is larger, but slightly lower. Audi 100 is 22 cm longer than the Skoda Octavia, 1 cm wider, while the height of Audi 100 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1310 litres | 1350 litres | |
|
Skoda Octavia has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Audi 100 has 170 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Octavia. This could mean that the Audi 100 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Octavia (by 40 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 100 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Octavia, which means Audi 100 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`945 | 1`995 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 100 has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |