Audi 100 1989 vs Mazda 626 1990

 
Audi 100
1989 - 1990
Mazda 626
1990 - 1992
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Petrol2.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 138 HP116 HP
Torque: 188 NM178 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds10.5 seconds
Audi 100 engine produces 22 HP more power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Mazda 626.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.68.2
Real fuel consumption: 10.2 l/100km8.6 l/100km
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi 100 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 100 could require 210 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 100 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 830 km in combined cycle730 km in combined cycle
780 km with real consumption690 km with real consumption
Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Audi 100 has 4x4: Vehicle features full-time Quattro II all-wheel drive - Torsen center differential with automatic torque split between front and rear axles, and electro-pneumatic manually-activated rear differential that automatically unlocks at speeds above 25 km/h.

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.59 m
Width: 1.81 m1.69 m
Height: 1.42 m1.46 m
Audi 100 is larger, but slightly lower.
Audi 100 is 20 cm longer than the Mazda 626, 12 cm wider, while the height of Audi 100 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 644 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1920 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Audi 100 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mazda 626, which means Audi 100 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9501`250
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 12002200
Pros and Cons: Audi 100 has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • has 4x4 drive
  • lower price
Mazda 626 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv