Audi 100 1988 vs Skoda Yeti 2009

 
Audi 100
1988 - 1990
Skoda Yeti
2009 - 2013
Body: SedanCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 90 HP160 HP
Torque: 142 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.6 seconds8.4 seconds
Skoda Yeti is a more dynamic driving.
Audi 100 engine produces 70 HP less power than Skoda Yeti, whereas torque is 108 NM less than Skoda Yeti. Due to the lower power, Audi 100 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.1no data

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.22 m
Width: 1.81 m1.79 m
Height: 1.42 m1.69 m
Audi 100 is larger, but lower.
Audi 100 is 57 cm longer than the Skoda Yeti, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi 100 is 27 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 570 litres405 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
610 litresno data
Audi 100 has more luggage capacity.
Audi 100 has 165 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Yeti.
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters10.3 meters
The turning circle of the Audi 100 is 1.3 metres more than that of the Skoda Yeti, which means Audi 100 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7102`065
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 18006400
Rating in user reviews: 8.4/10 8.2/10
Pros and Cons: Audi 100 has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Skoda Yeti has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv