Audi 100 1982 vs Jaguar XJ 1982

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Audi 100
1982 - 1988
Jaguar XJ
1982 - 1986
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Audi 100 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jaguar XJ can be equipped only with front wheel drive.
Engines: 1.8 - 2.3 (petrol, diesel)3.4 - 5.3 (petrol)

Performance

Power: 69 - 165 HP162 - 290 HP
Torque: 123 - 240 NM255 - 436 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.8 - 21.8 seconds8.7 - 11 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.7 - 10.912.5 - 14.1
Audi 100 petrol engines consumes on average 4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jaguar XJ.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.96 m
Width: 1.81 m1.77 m
Height: 1.42 m1.38 m
Audi 100 is 17 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJ, 4 cm wider, while the height of Audi 100 is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 570 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
610 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters13 meters
The turning circle of the Audi 100 is 1.4 metres less than that of the Jaguar XJ, which means Audi 100 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`784~ 1`500
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 2000no data
Pros and Cons: Audi 100 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Jaguar XJ has
  • only petrol engines available
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv