Audi 100 1988 vs Ford Sierra 1987
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Audi 100 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Ford Sierra can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 - 165 HP | 67 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 123 - 265 NM | 119 - 276 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 18.6 seconds | 6.5 - 19.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 11.6 | 6.7 - 10.3 | |
|
Audi 100 petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Sierra. On average, Audi 100 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Audi 100 is larger. Audi 100 is 32 cm longer than the Ford Sierra, 11 cm wider, while the height of Audi 100 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 570 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
610 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 100 is 1.6 metres more than that of the Ford Sierra, which means Audi 100 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`839 | ~ 1`232 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 100 has
|
Ford Sierra has
| |