Alfa Romeo 156 2003 vs Mitsubishi Galant 1997
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 305 NM | 202 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
Alfa Romeo 156 is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo 156 engine produces 50 HP more power than Mitsubishi Galant, whereas torque is 103 NM more than Mitsubishi Galant. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo 156 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 7.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
The Alfa Romeo 156 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Alfa Romeo 156 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Galant, which means that by driving the Alfa Romeo 156 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Alfa Romeo 156 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Galant. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 64 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
1340 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
940 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Alfa Romeo 156 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.44 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
Alfa Romeo 156 is 19 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Galant, width is practically the same , while the height of Alfa Romeo 156 is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 378 litres | 470 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1400 litres | |
Mitsubishi Galant has more luggage space. Alfa Romeo 156 has 92 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Galant. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 156 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Galant, which means Alfa Romeo 156 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | 1`870 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | Alfa Romeo 156 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Galant has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Alfa Romeo 156, so Alfa Romeo 156 quality is probably significantly better | ||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 156 has
|
Mitsubishi Galant has
| |