Alfa Romeo 156 2003 vs Mitsubishi Galant 1996

 
Alfa Romeo 156
2003 - 2005
Mitsubishi Galant
1996 - 1998
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 120 HP150 HP
Torque: 146 NM179 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds9.7 seconds
Mitsubishi Galant is a more dynamic driving.
Alfa Romeo 156 engine produces 30 HP less power than Mitsubishi Galant, whereas torque is 33 NM less than Mitsubishi Galant. Due to the lower power, Alfa Romeo 156 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.28.3
Real fuel consumption: 8.1 l/100km9.2 l/100km
The Alfa Romeo 156 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Alfa Romeo 156 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Galant, which means that by driving the Alfa Romeo 156 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Alfa Romeo 156 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Galant.
Fuel tank capacity: 63 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle
980 km on highway1000 km on highway
770 km with real consumption690 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 10 years23 years
Engine spread: Used also on Alfa Romeo 147Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo V40, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Galant might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.44 m4.63 m
Width: 1.74 m1.74 m
Height: 1.43 m1.42 m
Alfa Romeo 156 is 19 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Galant, width is practically the same , while the height of Alfa Romeo 156 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 378 litres470 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1400 litres
Mitsubishi Galant has more luggage space.
Alfa Romeo 156 has 92 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Galant.
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 156 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Galant.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7501`850
Safety: no datano data
Quality:Alfa Romeo 156 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Galant has serious deffects in 100 percent more cases than Alfa Romeo 156, so Alfa Romeo 156 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 12002000
Pros and Cons: Alfa Romeo 156 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Mitsubishi Galant has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv