Alfa Romeo 156 2002 vs SAAB 9-3 2003

 
Alfa Romeo 156
2002 - 2003
SAAB 9-3
2003 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 120 HP122 HP
Torque: 146 NM167 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds11.5 seconds
Alfa Romeo 156 engine produces 2 HP less power than SAAB 9-3, whereas torque is 21 NM less than SAAB 9-3. Despite less power, Alfa Romeo 156 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.27.9
Real fuel consumption: 8.7 l/100km8.2 l/100km
The SAAB 9-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Alfa Romeo 156 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 156 could require 45 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Alfa Romeo 156 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3.
Fuel tank capacity: 63 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle780 km in combined cycle
980 km on highway1000 km on highway
720 km with real consumption750 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.43 m4.64 m
Width: 1.74 m1.76 m
Height: 1.42 m1.47 m
Alfa Romeo 156 is smaller.
Alfa Romeo 156 is 21 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-3, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Alfa Romeo 156 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 380 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 156 is 0.3 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-3.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7501`400
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

high
SAAB 9-3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 156 has serious deffects in 165 percent more cases than SAAB 9-3, so SAAB 9-3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 10001600
Pros and Cons: Alfa Romeo 156 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
SAAB 9-3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv