Alfa Romeo 156 1997 vs Mitsubishi Galant 1997
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 190 HP | 163 HP | |
Torque: | 222 NM | 223 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
Alfa Romeo 156 is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo 156 engine produces 27 HP more power than Mitsubishi Galant, but torque is 1 NM less than Mitsubishi Galant. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo 156 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 9.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
The Mitsubishi Galant is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Alfa Romeo 156 consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Galant, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 156 could require 315 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Alfa Romeo 156 consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Galant. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 64 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
750 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
560 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Mitsubishi Galant gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.43 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
Alfa Romeo 156 is 20 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Galant, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 470 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1400 litres | |
Mitsubishi Galant has more luggage space. Alfa Romeo 156 has 90 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Galant. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 156 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Galant, which means Alfa Romeo 156 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`880 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | average | |
Mitsubishi Galant has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 156 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Galant, so Mitsubishi Galant quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 6.2/10 | 5.8/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 156 has
|
Mitsubishi Galant has
| |