Alfa Romeo 156 1997 vs Mitsubishi Galant 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 304 NM | 202 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo 156 is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo 156 engine produces 46 HP more power than Mitsubishi Galant, whereas torque is 102 NM more than Mitsubishi Galant. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo 156 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Alfa Romeo 156 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Alfa Romeo 156 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Galant, which means that by driving the Alfa Romeo 156 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Alfa Romeo 156 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Galant. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Alfa Romeo 156 is 20 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Galant, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1400 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Galant has more luggage space. Alfa Romeo 156 has 90 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Galant. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 156 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Galant, which means Alfa Romeo 156 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Galant has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 156 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Galant, so Mitsubishi Galant quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.2/10 | 5.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 156 has
|
Mitsubishi Galant has
| |