Alfa Romeo 156 2002 vs Alfa Romeo 156 2003

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Alfa Romeo 156
2002 - 2006
Alfa Romeo 156
2003 - 2005
Body: Estate car / wagonSedan
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 3.21.6 - 3.2

Performance

Power: 115 - 250 HP115 - 250 HP
Torque: 146 - 385 NM146 - 385 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.3 - 11.6 seconds6.3 - 10.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.0 - 12.35.8 - 12.1
Alfa Romeo 156 2002 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Alfa Romeo 156 2003. On average, Alfa Romeo 156 2002 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156 2003.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.43 m4.44 m
Width: 1.74 m1.74 m
Height: 1.42 m1.43 m
Both cars are similar in size. Alfa Romeo 156 2002 is 1 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo 156 2003, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 360 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1180 litresno data
Alfa Romeo 156 2002 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 156 2003.
Turning diameter: 12.1 meters12.1 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`850~ 1`793
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

low
Average price (€): 12001200
Pros and Cons:
    Alfa Romeo 156 has
    • lower fuel consumption
    • roomier boot
    • fewer faults
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv