Volvo V90 1997 vs Opel Omega 1999

 
Volvo V90
1997 - 1997
Opel Omega
1999 - 2001
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 3.0 Petrol3.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 180 HP211 HP
Torque: 260 NM270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 seconds9 seconds
Opel Omega is a more dynamic driving.
Volvo V90 engine produces 31 HP less power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Opel Omega. Due to the lower power, Volvo V90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.010.5
Volvo V90 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V90 could require 75 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle710 km in combined cycle

Dimensions

Length: 4.86 m4.90 m
Width: 1.75 m1.78 m
Height: 1.45 m1.50 m
Volvo V90 is smaller.
Volvo V90 is 4 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo V90 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 992 litres540 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1702 litres1800 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Volvo V90 has 452 litres more trunk space than the Opel Omega. The Opel Omega may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Omega (by 98 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.7 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo V90 is 1.3 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means Volvo V90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1002`280
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 22001200
Pros and Cons: Volvo V90 has
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Opel Omega has
  • more power
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv