Volvo V90 1997 vs Ford Scorpio 1995
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 180 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 260 NM | 229 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
Volvo V90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V90 engine produces 30 HP more power than Ford Scorpio, whereas torque is 31 NM more than Ford Scorpio. Thanks to more power Volvo V90 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 11.3 | |
Volvo V90 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio, which means that by driving the Volvo V90 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
Volvo V90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.86 m | 4.83 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
Volvo V90 is 3 cm longer than the Ford Scorpio, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo V90 is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 992 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1702 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 9.7 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo V90 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Volvo V90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 2`000 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 2200 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V90 has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |