Volvo S90 2020 vs Mazda 6 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 445 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Volvo S90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S90 engine produces 6 HP more power than Mazda 6, but torque is 45 NM less than Mazda 6. Thanks to more power Volvo S90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 62 litres | |
| Ground clearance: | 156 mm (6.1 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Volvo S90 is larger, but slightly lower. Volvo S90 is 10 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S90 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 461 litres | 489 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo S90 has 28 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. This could mean that the Volvo S90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 250 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 238 metres more than that of the Mazda 6, which means Volvo S90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 41 200 | 24 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |