Volvo S90 2015 vs Jaguar XF 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 235 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 480 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Volvo S90 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S90 engine produces 55 HP more power than Jaguar XF, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Jaguar XF. Thanks to more power Volvo S90 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo S90 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S90 could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S90 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo XC90, Volvo XC60, Volvo V90, Volvo V90 Cross Country | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE, Land Rover Discovery Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar XF might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jaguar XF engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
| Volvo S90 and Jaguar XF are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 540 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage space. Volvo S90 has 40 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 250 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S90 is 238.4 metres more than that of the Jaguar XF, which means Volvo S90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`250 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Volvo S90 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 600 | 21 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S90 has
|
Jaguar XF has
| |