Volvo S70 1996 vs Volvo S60 2000

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

	Volvo S70 1996 - 2000	Volvo S60 2000 - 2004
Gearbox:	Manual/Automatic	Manual/Automatic
Engines:	2.0 - 2.5	2.0 - 2.5
Performance
Power:	126 - 250 HP	130 - 300 HP
Torque:	170 - 350 NM	192 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	6.7 - 12.1 seconds	5.7 - 12 seconds
	Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	6.3 - 11.7	6.5 - 13.0
	Volvo S70 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo S60. On average, a Volvo S70 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Volvo S60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions
Length:	4.72 m	4.58 m
Width:	1.76 m	1.80 m
Height:	1.39 m	1.43 m
	Volvo S70 is 14 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S70 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity:	470 litres	424 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down	no data	1034 litres
	Volvo S70 has more luggage capacity. Volvo S70 has 46 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60.
Turning diameter:	11.3 meters	13 meters
	The turning circle of the Volvo S70 is 1.7 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means Volvo S70 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg):	~ 1`732	~ 2`030

Safety:
Quality:	below average	above average
Average price (€):	1200	1400
Rating in user reviews:	8.0/10	8.0/10
Pros and Cons:	Volvo S70 has roomier boot better manoeuvrability lower price	Volvo S60 has lower fuel consumption for petrol engines fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Volvo S70 1996 vs Volvo S60 2000

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions