Volvo C70 2006 vs Chrysler Sebring 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 230 HP | 172 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 222 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Volvo C70 engine produces 58 HP more power than Chrysler Sebring, whereas torque is 98 NM more than Chrysler Sebring. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 9.5 | |
| Volvo C70 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring, which means that by driving the Volvo C70 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Volvo C70 is smaller. Volvo C70 is 27 cm shorter than the Chrysler Sebring, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo C70 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 200 litres | 193 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
404 litres | no data | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Volvo C70 has 7 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Sebring. The Chrysler Sebring may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo C70 has
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |