Volvo C70 2002 vs Toyota Celica 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 285 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
| Volvo C70 engine produces 25 HP more power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 99 NM more than Toyota Celica. Thanks to more power Volvo C70 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 9.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo C70 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.33 m | |
|
Volvo C70 is larger. Volvo C70 is 22 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 7 cm wider, while the height of Volvo C70 is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 262 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C70 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Volvo C70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`020 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo C70 has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |