Volvo C70 1997 vs Toyota Celica 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is a more dynamic driving. Volvo C70 engine produces 5 HP less power than Toyota Celica, but torque is 34 NM more than Toyota Celica. Due to the lower power, Volvo C70 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 9.9 | |
| Volvo C70 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that by driving the Volvo C70 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo C70 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.33 m | |
|
Volvo C70 is larger. Volvo C70 is 22 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 7 cm wider, while the height of Volvo C70 is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C70 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Volvo C70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo C70 has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |