Volvo C70 1999 vs Toyota Celica 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
| Volvo C70 engine produces 18 HP more power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 84 NM more than Toyota Celica. Despite the higher power, Volvo C70 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 9.9 | |
|
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo C70 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo C70 could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S70 | Used also on Toyota Carina E | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Volvo C70 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.33 m | |
|
Volvo C70 is larger. Volvo C70 is 22 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 7 cm wider, while the height of Volvo C70 is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C70 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Volvo C70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo C70 has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |