Volvo C70 2006 vs SAAB 9-3 2007

 
Volvo C70
2006 - 2009
SAAB 9-3
2007 - 2010
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.4 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 180 HP180 HP
Torque: 350 NM370 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 seconds9.5 seconds
Volvo C70 and SAAB 9-3 have the same engine power, but Volvo C70 torque is 20 NM less than SAAB 9-3.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.36.9
Real fuel consumption: 7.2 l/100km7.2 l/100km
The SAAB 9-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volvo C70 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo C70 could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres59 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 840 km in combined cycle850 km in combined cycle
1060 km on highway1110 km on highway
860 km with real consumption810 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.65 m
Width: 1.82 m1.78 m
Height: 1.40 m1.44 m
Volvo C70 is 7 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-3, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volvo C70 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 200 litres235 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
404 litresno data
SAAB 9-3 has more luggage space.
Volvo C70 has 35 litres less trunk space than the SAAB 9-3.
Turning diameter: 12.7 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo C70 is 1.7 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-3, which means Volvo C70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`090no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

high
SAAB 9-3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo C70 has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than SAAB 9-3, so SAAB 9-3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 56005400
Pros and Cons:
    SAAB 9-3 has
    • lower fuel consumption
    • roomier boot
    • better manoeuvrability
    • fewer faults
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv