Volvo C70 2006 vs Chrysler Sebring 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 172 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 222 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Volvo C70 engine produces 2 HP less power than Chrysler Sebring, but torque is 8 NM more than Chrysler Sebring. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 9.5 | |
| Volvo C70 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo C70 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Volvo C70 is smaller. Volvo C70 is 27 cm shorter than the Chrysler Sebring, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo C70 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 200 litres | 193 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
404 litres | no data | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Volvo C70 has 7 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Sebring. The Chrysler Sebring may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C70 is 1.6 metres more than that of the Chrysler Sebring, which means Volvo C70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`090 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |